The Weekend Lens - Photography || Vintage Lens Reviews || Sony E-mount
  • HOME
  • PHOTO
    • Photo Series >
      • Moscow Metro
      • Japan on 2 wheels
      • Shisa Kanko
      • Tatami Garden
      • Hoi-An Fish Market
      • Profiles
    • Places >
      • Japan
      • Vietnam
    • Film
  • REVIEWS
    • Lenses >
      • Canon FL/FD/nFD >
        • Canon FL 55 f1.2
        • Canon FD 50 f1.4 SSC
        • Canon nFD 24 f2.8
        • Canon nFD 35 f2
        • Canon nFD 50 f1.4
        • Canon nFD 100 f2
        • Canon nFD 135 f2
      • Carl Zeiss >
        • Carl Zeiss 50 f1.7 T Planar
        • Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50 f1.8
      • Jupiter 3
      • Konica >
        • Konica AR 40 f1.8
        • Konica AR 135 f3.2
      • Nikkor >
        • Nikkor 50 f1.2 AIS
        • Nikkor 105 f2.5 AI
      • Olympus >
        • Olympus Zuiko 21 f3.5
        • Olympus Zuiko 24 f2.8
      • Pentax >
        • Super-Takumar 50 f1.4
        • Pentax-M 50mm f1.4 SMC
        • Pentax 135 f2.5 SMC
      • Samyang 12 f2
      • Tokina AT-X 90 f2.5 Macro
      • Vivitar 55 f2.8 Macro
      • Voigtlander FE 15/4.5
    • Motion Studies
    • Lens Index
  • ABOUT
    • Intro
    • Portfolio

2015

Canon nFD 24 f2.8- The closer you get, the better 

Sony A7 Canon FD 24mm

I had this one on an old AE-1 and really enjoyed shooting with it and was wondering how it would do on digital.  I thought I'd give the nFD 24 f2.8 a second try on an upcoming trip to Vietnam. Was it up for the job?

​The Canon nFD 24/2.8 specs:
  • 10 elements in 9 groups
  • Weight - 240 grams
  • Length - 43mm (68 mm with adapter)
  • Filter size - 52 mm
  • Min. focus distance - 0.3 m
  • Aperture - 6 blades, f2.8 to f22 in half stops

Build Quality/Handling (very good/very good)

The build quality is typical nFD, which means you get more plastic than metal making the lens pretty light. There is a nice, wide, rubberized focus ring that gives good grip and makes manual focusing a breeze. As is the case with all nFD lenses I've tried, the aperture ring experience isn't great, but is adequate. One redeeming quality is that it has half-stop clicks, which is a nice feature on FD lenses.

The nFD 24 f2.8 is well balanced on the A7s and the whole package remains fairly compact. My copy has slightly stiff focusing
 and about 1mm of play in the focus ring (a common issue with nFD lenses). These don't really effect the shooting experience much and I enjoy having this lens on my camera.

Image Quality (excellent for close ups; decent for landscapes)

Sharpness is very good even wide open for subjects which are close to medium distances away. At infinity focus, however, the lens (or at least my copy) doesn't quite reach the same level of sharpness. I would say that it's sharpest (at infinity) at about f8, but even then it's nothing to rave about. 

Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
f2.8/ISO 2000
Picture
100% crop
Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
100% crop
Picture
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
f5.6/ISO 100
Picture
f2.8 - 100% crop
Picture
f5.6 - 100% crop
Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
f2.8/ISO 800
Picture
100% crop
Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
f2.8/ISO 100
Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
100% crop
Picture
f4/ISO 100
Picture
f8/ISO 100
Picture
f4 - 100% crop
Picture
f8 - 100% crop

To my eyes even the f8 crop above (though clearly sharper than the others and sharp enough for general use) is lacking critical sharpness. I tried the lens with a couple different adapters with similar results, so I don't think that it's an adapter issue. Is lateral CA the culprit here? Perhaps I'm expecting too much from a 12mp sensor?

*Update*  

The above shots were taken before I got the Sony a6000 and the Metabones adapter. I realize now that some of my cheap adapters did not reach infinity. So, was it an adapter issue? Here are a couple of samples with the a6000. 

Picture
Picture
100% crop from lower centre and lower right edge @ f2.8, f4, f5.6, f8

Centre performance looks quite good at f5.6 and f8. It's actually decent at f2.8, too. The edges, however, don't improve all that much. Also, we're talking edges on an APS-C sensor, here. I doubt this lens would resolve enough corner detail on a high-megapixel full-frame sensor.  Still, it appears to do better than on the shots with the A7s, but the distance here is not quite infinity. The shot below shows how it does at true infinity with the a6000 and the Metabones adapter. 

Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
Picture
f8/ISO 100 - Expand to view 100% centre crop

Looks alright, but I'd be interested to see how it does on the A7Rii. 

​The FD 24 has visible vignetting wide open, which improves quite a bit stopped down and basically disappears by f5.6.

Picture
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
f5.6/ISO 100

Since the minimum focus distance is only 30 cm, it's pretty easy to throw the background out of focus. The bokeh isn't the smoothest I've seen but it has an interesting, almost plastic-like quality... I'm not sure how to describe it actually, so I'll just let the pictures below do the talking. In any case, I like it! 

Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
f2.8/ISO 100
Picture
f2.8/ISO 100

There's a bit of CA visible but I've not found it to be an issue in real-world use. There's also wavy barrel distortion apparent in some photos, which is difficult to correct. However,  I don't usually feel the need to correct it. The examples below show the distortion you can expect from this lens.

Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
That doorframe was actually straight
Canon FD 24mm f2.8 Sony a7
Barrel-shaped walls
Picture
f5.6/ISO 1000
Picture
f4/ISO 1000
Picture
f5.6/ISO 10000

Finally, I'm once again impressed with Canon's SSC coating and how effectively it controls flare. Sure, the lens shows some minor ghosting in extreme situations. However, there seems to be little loss of contrast with the light source directly in the frame or just outside the angle of view. This is great performance especially when compared to some of the other vintage lenses I have such as the Konica AR 40 f1.8, for example.

Picture
Picture

Conclusion

The Canon nFD 24 f2.8 is almost a great wide angle lens. It's contrasty, has fairly low CA, shows very good flare resistance and is sharp, unless you're shooting at infinity. Its distortion isn't terrible either. Add to this its compact size and weight and mix in the attractive price (currently going for about $100) and you got yourself a winner. Certainly, its only real shortcoming (some softness at infinity?) is not enough to keep it out of my camera bag and I'll be hanging on to this one for a while. It's worth noting that at its current price this lens is quite a bit cheaper than most similar lenses from other manufacturers. I'm not sure, however, how it compares to the Olympuses, Minoltas, Pentaxes, and other 24s of the 70s and 80s as I haven't shot with any of them yet. In the end, I'm pretty happy with the quality of shots I get with this lens, especially if the subject isn't too far away.

Check out the Motion Studies section to see some video footage recorded with the lens.


Related reviews
  • Samyang 12mm f2
  • Voigrtlander 15mm f4.5
  • Olympus Zuiko 21mm f3.5

                                                                                   Sample Images

© 2020 The Weekend Lens                                                                                               SUBSCRIBE                                                                                                    Contact